November 11, 2009...5:53 pm

Socialism 2009

Jump to Comments

It must be that time of year again. Last weekend saw one of my rare trips down to London (malfunctioning public transport plus expensive pints does not make this one of my top UK destinations) for the Socialist Party’s annual event Socialism 2009.

Unfortunately, I can’t provide you with a comprehensive report this year as I was only down for the Sunday. If your are looking for reports and impressions, Phil’s got a round up and there’s now a full report on the main site.

Still, I got to a couple of sessions and the final rally.

Unsurprisingly, the first session I went along to was “How to defeat the BNP?” (it’s a bit of a hobby). In previous year’s attendance at the Sunday morning sessions has tended to be a little thin on the ground after people have enjoyed a few refreshment’s the previous night but there was a decent turnout.

We first heard from a lad from the Socialist Party in Northern Ireland about the series of racist attacks which had taken place against Roma people earlier this year, the total disinterest of this police and how they’d organised a campaign to defend people having their windows bricked in as they eat their dinner. Engaging stuff and the work they’ve been doing is commendable but it’s (thankfully!) a very different political situation to the one we face here.

Dave Reid from Socialist Party Wales then gave a brief overview of the Socialist Party’s approach to tackling the far right which regular readers of this blog will be familiar with. He stressed the need for a political alternative and the necessity of propaganda which demonstrated the utter, utter failure of the BNP to act in the interests of the people they see as their core constituency (the white working-class).

All good stuff and I hoped we talk about this in more detail. However, I made the first contribution from the floor to pick up on something he’d said about No Platform, a less concise version of the argument I put forward here. The next person to speak opined that No Platform was working just fine and what needed was more of it and so the discussion ended up focusing primarily on this issue for the rest of the session. Should have kept my mouth shut!

The first session was a bit of a wasted opportunity so I did keep quiet during the afternoon session: “Lessons of Lindsey: what the construction workers’ struggle is really about”. Having written so much on this site during the strikes this was a cracking opportunity to hear first hand what had happened from some of the strikers. Keith Gibson, a member of the strike committee, spoke along with Bill Mullins, Industrial Organiser for the Socialist Party and veteran of the strikes in the car industry during the 70’s and 80’s.

Keith spoke on the difficulties that have long plagued attempts at organising in the construction industry. When jobs only last a few months before the workforce disperses to other sites around the country it’s hard to take long-term action about specific greivances. Balloting the entire workforce, then waiting for a cooling off period before an official strike can be launched means that the site can be built before a strike can take place.

This is what made the dispute at Lindsey so significant, strikes there sparked a walkout at sites nationwide in solidarity. They were successful as well. A concerted attempt by management was defeated in two big waves of wildcat strikes and this has important implications for what will happen in the sector in the future.

Anyway, it’s a shame I wasn’t there for the whole weekend. Left-wing groups are famed for inflating attendance numbers at meetings and marches but I think there is good evidence this was the most successful Socialism weekend yet. The fact we’ve moved the final rally from a room at the University of London union, to a lecture theatre to the Friend’s Meeting House opposite Euston Station.

It’s difficult to relate the experiences of what it’s like being at rally so I won’t bore you with my attempts though I will pick up on one point made at the rally.

Over the course of the weekend we apparently managed to raise £25 grand. However, there’s a General Election coming up next year and along with plans to stand in a number of parliamentary seats four Socialist Party councillors are up for re-election.

Socialist Party members reading this will already have heard this and I don’t expect any of my regular readers from the BNP to put their hands in their pocket (though I’ve they’ve temporarily taken leave of their senses…) but what we’ve already raised isn’t enough. You can see what I’m getting at.

What do you get for your money? Nothing, we get it.

Seriously though, I know a fair few of my readers are independent minded socialists or from other radical political traditions (the three groups of people I’ve mentioned above cover, I think, about 90% of my readership).

I don’t expect you to suspend the political criticisms you have of our politics or our approach or ignore any mistakes you think we’ve made in the past or are likely to make again in the future. Whatever criticisms people have, individuals from the sensible left can appreciate that we are one of the few socialist organisations who talk about things which ordinary working-class people actually care about and have put down roots in a small number of areas round the country following years of patient, consistent political work.

If we can’t defend our council seats after years of serious grassroots community work there and poll a crap vote in the General Election the future doesn’t look bright for any of us.

socialism09
1000 people listening intently, count ‘em.

11 Comments

  • Red Star Blackpool

    Hi, Duncan. I was in the same session as you on Sunday morning, and would agree that the discussion was somewhat sidetracked by the No Platform issue. A bit more discussion on the Northern Ireland comrade’s contribution would have been good, for example.

  • As I say, I’ll keep my mouth shut in future!

  • Speaking of no platform, I want to put some anti-BNP comedy in my show Poles Apart but is that giving them a platform?

    Ideas on a postcard please…

  • Crafty way to work your new show into the comments box Daniel…

    Puff piece on it’s way, honest.

  • It was an honest question guv!

    Do you think we should have BNP material in the show?

  • Hi,

    The chap you refer to is Paddy.

    My experience of Paddy is not one that I would go into in full here.

    I wont even mention his alleged “kidnapping” story. I tend to think he is under the impession he can get away with it because it happened way, way away in in little ole’ Ireland.

    Comrades in London have been made aware of this and this may explain why more time was not given to this issue.

    Certainly the Travelling community could tell you about his uncomradely behaviour and the damage he has done wih his self-seeking behaviour to community and antiracist relations here.

    Sal.

  • First Timer,

    Usually my attitude towards commenting on this site is ‘anything goes’ providing people pick a name, or pseudonym, and stick to it but I’m uneasy at specific, anonymous allegations against named comrades which I know nothing about.

    Don’t take this the wrong way, and I’ve no reason not to trust your account, but at a time when Socialist Party Ireland members are facing quite a vicious campaign as a result of anti-racist work it’s not beyond the realms of possibility that stuff like this would be spread to discredit the work that they’re doing (not that I’m suggesting you are!).

    I’ll allow your comment but I’ve removed the bloke in questions surname.

    • Duncan,

      Yes, we are involved in a rather bitter disagreement with the SWP and of course with “Republicans” whose only loyalty is to the sale of drugs to the working class.

      If you speak to people in London, they have been made aware of the concerns of comrades in Ireland.

      It is hardly a hidden “campaign”. It is a campaign for the truth about the behaviour of some comrades regarding the issue of the Roma families. It has left a stain upon the movement and continues to be a source of great embarrassment that this individual now is prepared to cross the water to spread his self-gratifying lies and myths.

      I shall say no more.

      • Similar allegations re the Roma were made by a leader of an NGO on BBC Norhtern Ireland just after the incident with the Roma.

        He was forced to completely withdraw his allegations as he could not substantiate them. nor can you of course.

        The only truth in your post is that London is aware of the the allegations. We certainly are but we give them about as much credence as allegations Militant used violence and intimidation to gain control of Liverpool City Council or any of the other slanders that have been directed at us by people afraid of honest political debate.

  • [...] also: And Now For Something Completely Sectarian, Nation of Duncan and David Bishop) Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Step 2 of 5: Staying [...]

  • Here are the allegations which I presume the bould ‘Sal’ wishes to say no more about:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/8153386.stm

    This is the reply of the Socialist Party:

    http://youthagainstracism.wordpress.com/2009/07/24/in-defence-of-anti-racist-protest-a-reply-to-derek-hanway/

    So ‘Sal’ do you have anything substantial to add?


Leave a Reply