Odd then you spend so much time here and so much time leaving comments, which would suggest you don’t hate at all but need this place, lke some kind of surrogate parent.
This is not lively debate, debate is reasoned arguments meeting with the idea of common ground being found and quite possibly changing minds, or at least investigating ideas.
Also, as for your reasons to come back here, that isn’t why you first came here, you first came here to stir up trouble and be a pain in the ass, your excuses are as wet as your ideas.
Oi! Hoffman-Gill, my mate Ted has just given me a leaflet from the dole office where it says the government will use tax-payers money to subsidise employers who take on the low-life scum you speak highly of…
Why is the government using our hard-earned taxes to line the pockets of greedy employers?!
Genuine non-parasite unemployed will now be shoved to the back of the queue, as greedy employers take on idiots and milk the system!
How can you in your infinite wisdom and socially aware conscience justify this shit?!
Low-life scum? Are you referring to Ted, your mates on the dole or the imaginary vast bulwark of people who don’t want to work?
You do realise your terrible phrasing of ideas is part of the problem.
As for this scheme, it seems to be to be a perfectly sensible initiative to help the unemployed and as you hate helping anyone, this makes you angry.
Also, you do know your argument is built on wild generalisations, such as ‘greedy employers’ I mean, is this everyone who employs someone, are they all greedy, who exactly are you talking about or is it yet more vague, silly, half-formed ideas that you spew forth your knee-jerk reaction to?
Also, who are these genuine non-parasite unemployed?
Who will be pushing them to the back of this imaginary queue that doesn’t exist?
You openly admit on a so-called socialists blog that you support low-paid employment and encourage capitalists to take advantage of the current economic climate by leeching money from the British tax-payer to employ idiots at the expense of genuine non-parasites!
More from Ted’s leaflet:
“Volunteering can help you keep your skills up to date or gain new skills and experience that might help you find and keep a job”
In other words- Slave labour paid for by the British tax payer!
PS. I am as you know and pointed out a SOCIALIST, not the soppy middle-class mummy’s boy who buys into the multicultural drivel that you adhere to, not the marxist, globalist, internationalist bollocks that the unions endorse…
You have no idea what the word means, I’ll help you.
“Socialism refers to any one of various theories of economic organization advocating public or collective ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods, and a society characterized by equal opportunities/means for all individuals with a more egalitarian method of compensation.”
Again, you don’t know what socialism is, that is the broad dictionary definition, not some kind of Marxist agenda however, perhaps the kind of socialism you’re into is national socialism, which in turn, isn’t socialism at all.
“Isn’t it funny how most of your type of socialist come from the upper middle class?”
That’s bollocks, there’s plenty of working class socialists and I bet you talking in the pub, just everyone’s a socialist whether they call themselves that or not. Plenty of the upper class bastards on your side though, the likes of Griffin and the rest of his ultra Tory ilk.
In response to the above post, I’ll admit, (somewhat with reluctance) that Britan Awake does have a point here. I beleive he has in mind less the street-marching trade unionist or anarchist type socialist and more the grammar school Guardian reader, the type of bleeding-heart drivel spouting do-gooder’s that infect modern private schools and universities.
As a side note, I think it a long stretch to call Nick Griffin “upper class” (whatever that means these days) Cambridge educated or not.
Britain Awake, look at all the factory occuptations that have been happening recently, are these all middle class socialists or real working class socialists?
29 Comments
July 15, 2009 at 10:39 pm
Apologies for the comment froth in Compulsory Reading but Britain Napping and the Austral are such fun!
July 16, 2009 at 7:21 am
Apologies for the recent silence, normal service will resume shortly…
Yeah, fucking hurry up, I’m sick of trying to educate the ignorant ‘Thespian’ above!
July 16, 2009 at 4:52 pm
You do know Duncan hates you and everything you stand for?
Good, at least we’ve got that cleared up.
xxxx
July 16, 2009 at 8:25 pm
“You do know Duncan hates you and everything you stand for?”
Good, the feeling is mutual! And likewise with yourself!
It’s good to hate isn’t it?!
July 17, 2009 at 9:41 am
Odd then you spend so much time here and so much time leaving comments, which would suggest you don’t hate at all but need this place, lke some kind of surrogate parent.
Odd.
July 17, 2009 at 1:45 pm
Whats wrong with a bit of lively debate?!
Every time you post a reply on here we receive an E-mail to notify us of your ill-conceived rebuttal!
Thats why we keep coming back!
July 17, 2009 at 3:06 pm
This is not lively debate, debate is reasoned arguments meeting with the idea of common ground being found and quite possibly changing minds, or at least investigating ideas.
Also, as for your reasons to come back here, that isn’t why you first came here, you first came here to stir up trouble and be a pain in the ass, your excuses are as wet as your ideas.
July 16, 2009 at 9:07 pm
@ Dustin Hoffman-Gill
So you should apologise for YOUR comment froth.
July 17, 2009 at 9:43 am
I already have apologised for feeding the you two trolls but no chance of you two doing that, as all you’re interested is behaving like children.
Which is a bit sad but each to his own.
July 17, 2009 at 1:59 pm
Oi! Hoffman-Gill, my mate Ted has just given me a leaflet from the dole office where it says the government will use tax-payers money to subsidise employers who take on the low-life scum you speak highly of…
Why is the government using our hard-earned taxes to line the pockets of greedy employers?!
Genuine non-parasite unemployed will now be shoved to the back of the queue, as greedy employers take on idiots and milk the system!
How can you in your infinite wisdom and socially aware conscience justify this shit?!
July 17, 2009 at 3:10 pm
Low-life scum? Are you referring to Ted, your mates on the dole or the imaginary vast bulwark of people who don’t want to work?
You do realise your terrible phrasing of ideas is part of the problem.
As for this scheme, it seems to be to be a perfectly sensible initiative to help the unemployed and as you hate helping anyone, this makes you angry.
Also, you do know your argument is built on wild generalisations, such as ‘greedy employers’ I mean, is this everyone who employs someone, are they all greedy, who exactly are you talking about or is it yet more vague, silly, half-formed ideas that you spew forth your knee-jerk reaction to?
Also, who are these genuine non-parasite unemployed?
Who will be pushing them to the back of this imaginary queue that doesn’t exist?
You don’t think before you type.
July 17, 2009 at 4:49 pm
Thanks Hoff…
You openly admit on a so-called socialists blog that you support low-paid employment and encourage capitalists to take advantage of the current economic climate by leeching money from the British tax-payer to employ idiots at the expense of genuine non-parasites!
More from Ted’s leaflet:
“Volunteering can help you keep your skills up to date or gain new skills and experience that might help you find and keep a job”
In other words- Slave labour paid for by the British tax payer!
July 17, 2009 at 4:57 pm
Total straw man stuff, I’ve said no such thing at all.
Funny how as a racist nationalist you come to socialist blog just to be a troll.
“Volunteering can help you keep your skills up to date or gain new skills and experience that might help you find and keep a job”
In other words you idiot, adding to your skill set, let me guess, you’ve never volunteered for anything have you?
Shame, you should give it a try, might broaden your limited mental range.
July 17, 2009 at 5:07 pm
Ted doesn’t need to add to his ’skill set’, he just needs a decent wage to feed his bird and kid… What part of that can you not understand?!
Or what part of that do you not want to understand?!!!
July 17, 2009 at 5:09 pm
It’s you that doesn’t get it.
I’m done with this nonsense from you, you thick myopic racist.
July 17, 2009 at 5:14 pm
PS. I am as you know and pointed out a SOCIALIST, not the soppy middle-class mummy’s boy who buys into the multicultural drivel that you adhere to, not the marxist, globalist, internationalist bollocks that the unions endorse…
Real SOCIALISM, real working class SOCIALISM!
July 18, 2009 at 4:13 pm
You have no idea what the word means, I’ll help you.
“Socialism refers to any one of various theories of economic organization advocating public or collective ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods, and a society characterized by equal opportunities/means for all individuals with a more egalitarian method of compensation.”
That sounds like everything you hate…
July 18, 2009 at 5:35 pm
“a society characterized by equal opportunities/ means for all individuals with a more egalitarian method of compensation.”
That only applies to marxist internationalist style socialism, which follows a globalist agenda. Workers of the world unite etc…
BTW: Isn’t it funny how most of your type of socialist come from the upper middle class?
July 19, 2009 at 10:13 am
Again, you don’t know what socialism is, that is the broad dictionary definition, not some kind of Marxist agenda however, perhaps the kind of socialism you’re into is national socialism, which in turn, isn’t socialism at all.
Also, I’m not a socialist, or Marxist.
July 22, 2009 at 10:11 am
“Isn’t it funny how most of your type of socialist come from the upper middle class?”
That’s bollocks, there’s plenty of working class socialists and I bet you talking in the pub, just everyone’s a socialist whether they call themselves that or not. Plenty of the upper class bastards on your side though, the likes of Griffin and the rest of his ultra Tory ilk.
July 22, 2009 at 2:00 pm
In response to the above post, I’ll admit, (somewhat with reluctance) that Britan Awake does have a point here. I beleive he has in mind less the street-marching trade unionist or anarchist type socialist and more the grammar school Guardian reader, the type of bleeding-heart drivel spouting do-gooder’s that infect modern private schools and universities.
As a side note, I think it a long stretch to call Nick Griffin “upper class” (whatever that means these days) Cambridge educated or not.
July 22, 2009 at 2:07 pm
Oh good grief, argue the ideas not the person Joe.M
July 24, 2009 at 5:10 pm
Britain Awake, look at all the factory occuptations that have been happening recently, are these all middle class socialists or real working class socialists?
August 7, 2009 at 9:33 am
anyone that works for me ever strikes ,1 they get fired ! 2 they get a slap !
August 7, 2009 at 9:35 am
And then you get taken to court for breaking the law…twice.
HURRAH!
August 7, 2009 at 1:17 pm
Normal Bloke,
That include your wife and sons?
August 8, 2009 at 8:35 am
oh dear daniel, grow up eh theres a good lad.
sister wotsit, and two for me fkin daughter just 2 keep her in line .
August 8, 2009 at 2:35 pm
I’m not sure how grow up is much of a come back when you’ve just talked about breaking the law, twice and I point that out.
It’s more like you that needs to grow up, I thought that breaking the law is an act of a bit of a child, either mentally or actually.
August 8, 2009 at 9:17 am
Maybe your workers would just have a French style occupation and take you hostage, or maybe you’d just get a slap for being a prick.